Select a Journal


Export this article
Export this article as RIS | Text
 
Referenced by
5 newer articles

  1. Li, Ming (2007) . IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23(1)
    [CrossRef]
  2. O’Malley, Marcia K. (2006) Shared Control in Haptic Systems for Performance Enhancement and Training. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control 128(1)
    [CrossRef]
  3. Jenny, J.-Y. (2006) Geschichte und Entwicklung der computerassistierten Chirurgie in der Orthopädie. Der Orthopäde 35(10)
    [CrossRef]
  4. David Stulberg, S. (2003) How Accurate is Current TKR Instrumentation?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
    [CrossRef]
  5. Van Houten, E.E.W. (1999) An overlapping subzone technique for MR-based elastic property reconstruction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 42(4)
    [CrossRef]
Authors
B L Davies1, S J Harris1, W J Lin1, R D Hibberd1, R Middleton2, J C Cobb2

1Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine Mechatronics in Medicine Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering London
2Middlesex Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Surgery London

Abstract

Robotic surgery can be carried out automatically by using a robot to move the cutting tool under position control. However, although the surgeon can observe the procedure on a visual display and has the ability to stop the operation in an emergency, he has little direct contact with the task. An alternative approach is to involve the surgeon more directly, by his moving a robot using active force control. The robot is then used to allow motion in preprogrammed regions, by the surgeon back-driving the robot motors, while preventing motion in prohibited areas. This active constraint robot (or ACROBOT) is described in this paper applied to knee surgery, in which the knee bones are accurately machined to allow the fitting of prosthetic knee implants. The ACROBOT is, however, ideally suited to a range of surgical procedures, because it allows the surgeon to feel the forces exerted during cutting and take appropriate action. This ability to be in direct control, while being constrained to cut within a permitted region, enhances safety and makes the system more acceptable to the medical community. The system of programmable constraint also allows the ACROBOT to provide the traditional benefits of robot surgery, namely the ability to machine complex geometrical surfaces very accurately and to make repetitive motions tirelessly. The system also has a potential for minimally invasive procedures. In knee surgery, for example, the robot could operate through a small incision in the skin and excise a volume into which a small, specially designed, unicompartmental prosthesis could fit.

Keywords
robotic surgery, knee replacement, force control, active constraint
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
Image of the first page of the fulltext

Show References